OLYMPIC ISSUES - National Bias
I believe most of you have your own supporting countries, don't you? And you
would wish to read more about them.
Therefore in Hong Kong you will find many detailed articles about Chinese or
Hong Kong athletes. Such as in the Chinese newspapers. There are at least 3
pages on Chinese Athletes and only 1 page about international athlete. In Australia
the newspapers are mostly concentrated Australian athlete.
National Bias may be that it's showing that they concerned about their own losing
team. Such as in Hong Kong, there are lots of articles about San-San. It is
not true that she only lost but she also blamed others for her failure. So why
is she the only one that the press concerned about her? That is because they
are BIAS and concern mostly on their own country.
National
Bias on the Internet and TV
'No other Australian radio or television network, and few others in the world,
can claim such a long record of Olympic broadcasting'
And also 'With Australian teams and athletes having their greatest-ever representation'
It might not be national bias but if you compare how other countries are presented
to how 'well' Australia is then... well, you get the point! They can also do
this by saying how bad or how 'undeveloped' about the country who won the gold
medal. Take this for example, it is from the Internet Edition of Sydney Morning Herald on 13th October 2000 talking about Cameroon winning a football
match:
'A country of 15 million people, 40 percent of them living below the poverty
line, a life expectancy of just over 52 years of age, if you are male'
I mean, what does that have to do with the game? It's totally off topic! Even
if is has something to do with the Olympics, you won't say something like this
towards another country. It's just like me telling you 'You are poor and have
a low life expectancy, so there!' It's not right to say something like that,
not to mention it is disrespectful towards the country. And if a 'poor' country
loses, it'll be:
'No doubt mindful of his likely status as national scapegoat' (from Internet
edition of Sydney Morning Herald, 13th Oct. 2000)
It's just not fair to both the person and the country that he is representing.
Also, if you ever go into Fox Sports, you'd find that this is a whole American based website all because
of how they wrote the articles. They only say how 'good' they are and how 'well'
they did and how they are the 'best' at everything. You can see it being illustrated
in an article called 'Sportsmanship' by Stuart Hothem on 2nd Oct. 2000
'SYDNEY, Australia-At Sydney's "Friendly" Games, ugly unsportsmanlike
Americans abounded'
If you even have a chance to go in there, click into the article about sportsmanship
and into the 10 athletes who personify sportsmanship, you'll find that it only
has American athletes (said to be the 10 'good-guys' in sports).
Quote from the part about Shaquille O'Neal: One man can't guard Los Angeles
Lakers center Shaquille O'Neal in the post. Often, two men aren't enough. True,
the leader of the reigning NBA champions shoots free throws with all the smoothness
of sandpaper and has to be taken out of games late in the fourth quarter, but
he is still the dominant force in the NBA.
But since the internet is an 'International Meeting Place', less is spoken or at least not as obvious or they might be sued. Not only does the internet has it's own national bias portrayal but it is also in television broadcasting. Hong Kong, a big international city, has it's own way of national biasing. Like in one part of the opening ceremony where the athletes comes into the stadium, the commentators talks about how 'small' the country is and how 'little' amount of athletes there are. They are forgetting the fact that it is at least bigger than Hong Kong.
Hong Kong shows National Bias even though it is said to be an international city, and Australia is no better even though is says it is multicultural.
Conclusion
Ariel Mak